From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dickerson v. Federal Express Corporation

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division
Jul 17, 2008
Civil No. 08-2079-D/P (W.D. Tenn. Jul. 17, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-2079-D/P.

July 17, 2008


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On Februrary 8, 2008, the plaintiff filed his complaint against defendant and summons was issued. As it appeared to the court based on the docket that plaintiff failed to serve the defendant within 120 days of the filing of the complaint, the court entered an order on June 20, 2008, directing the plaintiff to show cause within eleven (11) days why his case should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to serve the summons and complaint within 120 days. The plaintiff was warned that failure to respond to the show cause order could result in dismissal of his case without further notice from the court. The plaintiff has failed to respond to the show cause order, and has still not served the defendant. It appears to the court, therefore, that the plaintiff's case should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to serve the defendant.

Accordingly, it is recommended that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to serve the defendant pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

NOTICE

ANY OBJECTIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO THIS REPORT MUST BE FILED WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS AFTER BEING SERVED WITH A COPY OF THE REPORT. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). FAILURE TO FILE THEM WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS MAY CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF OBJECTIONS, EXCEPTIONS, AND ANY FURTHER APPEAL.


Summaries of

Dickerson v. Federal Express Corporation

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division
Jul 17, 2008
Civil No. 08-2079-D/P (W.D. Tenn. Jul. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Dickerson v. Federal Express Corporation

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN R. DICKERSON, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division

Date published: Jul 17, 2008

Citations

Civil No. 08-2079-D/P (W.D. Tenn. Jul. 17, 2008)

Citing Cases

Pruitt v. McLaren Reg'l Med. Center-Flint

Finally, as discussed in defendants' papers, courts have applied judicial estoppel to dismiss a case in…