From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dickerman v. Jones

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Feb 14, 1946
328 Ill. App. 131 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)

Opinion

Gen. No. 43,336. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed February 14, 1946 Released for publication February 26, 1946

LIMITATIONS OF ACTION, § 113assignment to secure payment of attorney's fees as evidence of indebtedness within purview of Limitations Act. In contract action by attorney, based on written assignment, to recover legal fees in divorce proceeding, where defendant contended that contract was oral and five year statute of limitations barred recovery, and it appeared that defendant executed written assignment acknowledging her obligation to pay balance of fees due plaintiff as her attorney and making assignment to him of portion of sum to be paid under decree, held that such instrument was evidence of indebtedness in writing within purview of Limitations Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1943, ch. 83, par. 17; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 107.276).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. DENIS J. NORMOYLE, Judge, presiding.

Judgment affirmed. Heard in the second division, first district, this court at the February term, 1945.

Beckman, Healy, Reid Hough, for appellant;

William W. Curran, of counsel;

William T. Dickerman, pro se.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed February 14, 1946; released for publication February 26, 1946.


Summaries of

Dickerman v. Jones

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Feb 14, 1946
328 Ill. App. 131 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)
Case details for

Dickerman v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:William T. Dickerman, Appellee, v. Amy V. Jones, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Feb 14, 1946

Citations

328 Ill. App. 131 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)
65 N.E.2d 142

Citing Cases

Stanley v. Chastek

City of Rockford v. Hey et al. (1937) 366 Ill. 526, 9 N.E.2d 317, states the general principle of ejusdem…

Pocius v. Halvorsen

The rule which is applicable to the case at bar was set forth in Elmore v. Johnson, 143 Ill. 513 at page 525,…