From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dick v. Doral Greens Ltd. Partnership

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 7, 2002
291 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

190

February 7, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered February 6, 2001, which denied defendants-appellants' motion to dismiss the complaint and granted plaintiffs' cross motion for an extension of time to serve the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, the motion granted and the cross motion denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants-appellants, dismissing the complaint as against them.

ANDREW R. TULLOCH, for plaintiffs-respondents.

MICHAEL S. SELTZER, for defendants-appellants.

Before: Williams, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Lerner, Friedman, JJ.


We reverse and dismiss the complaint as against defendants-appellants herein for the reasons stated in Dick v. Doral Greens Ltd. Partnership ( 289 A.D.2d 74, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12085).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Dick v. Doral Greens Ltd. Partnership

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 7, 2002
291 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Dick v. Doral Greens Ltd. Partnership

Case Details

Full title:MARION POKOIK DICK, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. DORAL GREENS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 7, 2002

Citations

291 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
736 N.Y.S.2d 872