From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dicey v. Hanks

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 23, 2015
2:14-cv-2018 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2015)

Opinion


BERLAN LYNELL DICEY, Plaintiff, v. W. HANKS, et al., Defendants. No. 2:14-cv-2018 JAM AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 23, 2015

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         On August 17, 2015, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 30. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall file and serve an opposition to the motion for summary judgment or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in the recommendation that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

Dicey v. Hanks

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 23, 2015
2:14-cv-2018 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Dicey v. Hanks

Case Details

Full title:BERLAN LYNELL DICEY, Plaintiff, v. W. HANKS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 23, 2015

Citations

2:14-cv-2018 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2015)