From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DiBiase v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 13, 2020
16 Civ. 4722 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 2020)

Opinion

16 Civ. 4722 (ER) 12 Crim. 834 (ER)

11-13-2020

PAUL DIBIASE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

On May 29, 2020, this Court denied Petitioner Paul DiBiase's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Doc. 36. On June 24, Petitioner requested a certificate of appealability from this Court. Doc. 37. "A certificate of appealability may issue . . . only if the [Petitioner] has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Because Petitioner cannot meet his burden under § 2253(c)(2), his request for a certificate of appealability is denied. Belk v. U.S., Nos. 05 Civ. 2696 (LTS) (HBP), 01 Crim. 180 (LTS), 2006 WL963880, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. April 13, 2006). In addition, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore denies in forma pauperis status for the purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

It is SO ORDERED. Dated: November 13, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

DiBiase v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 13, 2020
16 Civ. 4722 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 2020)
Case details for

DiBiase v. United States

Case Details

Full title:PAUL DIBIASE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 13, 2020

Citations

16 Civ. 4722 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 2020)