From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diaz v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
CASE NO. 11CV0553-JLS (WMC) (S.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 11CV0553-JLS (WMC)

01-05-2012

JESUS DIAZ, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, ET AL., Defendant.


JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL BY COURT

UNDER RULE 4(m) F.R.Civ.P. FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

The above-entitled cause, having come before the court on a calendar called pursuant to notice under Rule 4(m), F.R.Civ.P. for failure to serve process, and it appearing to the court that the summons and complaint have not been served, and no extension of time to serve has been requested, therefore,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-entitled cause is hereby dismissed as to all defendants without prejudice, for want of prosecution.

___________

JANIS L. SAMMARTINO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ENTERED ON ____________


Summaries of

Diaz v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
CASE NO. 11CV0553-JLS (WMC) (S.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Diaz v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:JESUS DIAZ, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, ET AL., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 11CV0553-JLS (WMC) (S.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)