From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diaz v. Cumberland County Jail

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Sep 23, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-3932 (JBS) (D.N.J. Sep. 23, 2010)

Summary

dismissing claims for lack of running water while incarcerated, and citing Rivera v. Walker, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88787, at *14 (S.D. Ill. June 9, 2008)

Summary of this case from Brooks v. Camden Cnty. Jail

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-3932 (JBS).

September 23, 2010


ORDER


For the reasons expressed in the Opinion filed herewith,

IT IS on this 23rd day of September 2010,

ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Clerk shall file the Complaint without prepayment of the filing fee; and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey and upon the Warden of Plaintiff's current place of confinement; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff is assessed a filing fee of $350.00 which shall be deducted from his prison account pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) in the manner set forth below, regardless of the outcome of the litigation; and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)(A), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee equal to 20% of the average monthly deposits to the Plaintiff's prison account for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the Complaint; when funds exist, the New Jersey Department of Corrections shall deduct said initial fee from Plaintiff's prison account and forward it to the Clerk; and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), until the $350.00 filing fee is paid, each subsequent month that the amount in Plaintiff's prison account exceeds $10.00, the New Jersey Department of Corrections shall assess, deduct from the Plaintiff's account, and forward to the Clerk payments equal to 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's prison account, with each payment referencing the docket number of this action; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and Opinion filed herewith upon Plaintiff by regular mail; and it is further

ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED; such dismissal is with prejudice with regard to all claims against Defendant Cumberland County Jail, and also with regard to Plaintiff's claims asserting denial of request to file a criminal complaint and Plaintiff's housing in cells without running water. Plaintiff's remaining claims asserting denial of recreation, denial of legal phone calls and retaliatory actions by jail officials are dismissed without prejudice to curing defects in an Amended Complaint in accordance with the accompanying Opinion; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall administratively terminate this matter by making a new and separate entry on the docket reading "CIVIL CASE TERMINATED"; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff may have this matter reopened in the event Plaintiff files, within thirty days from the date of entry of this Order, Plaintiff's amended complaint detailing, in accordance with guidance provided to Plaintiff in the Opinion filed herewith, Plaintiff's claims asserting denial of recreation, denial of legal phone calls and retaliatory actions by jail officials; and it is finally

ORDERED that, if Plaintiff timely files such amended complaint, the Court will direct the Clerk to reopen this matter and will screen Plaintiff's amended complaint.


Summaries of

Diaz v. Cumberland County Jail

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Sep 23, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-3932 (JBS) (D.N.J. Sep. 23, 2010)

dismissing claims for lack of running water while incarcerated, and citing Rivera v. Walker, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88787, at *14 (S.D. Ill. June 9, 2008)

Summary of this case from Brooks v. Camden Cnty. Jail

dismissing claims for lack of running water while incarcerated, and citing Rivera v. Walker, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88787, at *14 (S.D. Ill. June 9, 2008) (applying Eighth Amendment analysis to conclude that, since "the lack of running water was a temporary condition [because] Plaintiff was placed in [the cell without running water in] August ... and ... transferred [out of that cell in] October ..., about six weeks later, [this time line leads the court to conclude that,] although the situation was not desirable, the lack of running water in his cell for about six weeks ... did not violate plaintiff's rights")

Summary of this case from Alpheaus v. Camden Cnty. Corr. Facility
Case details for

Diaz v. Cumberland County Jail

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DIAZ, Plaintiff, v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Sep 23, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-3932 (JBS) (D.N.J. Sep. 23, 2010)

Citing Cases

Wiley v. Ky. Dep't of Corr.

The short-term lack of running water is also not a condition that violates the Eighth Amendment. See Richmond…

Spencer v. Wilson

Nor does temporary placement in a cell without running water violate the Eighth Amendment. Diaz v. Cumberland…