From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diamond v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 17, 1938
94 F.2d 1012 (6th Cir. 1938)

Opinion

Nos. 7746-7755.

February 17, 1938.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio; Samuel H. West, Judge.

Herman E. Kohen, William J. Corrigan, and Gerard Pilliod, all of Cleveland, Ohio, Julian C. Ryer, of Chicago, Ill., and C.F. McConnell, Henry Galen, Henry A. Pollack, Stephen M. Young, and Harry F. Glick, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellants.

E.B. Freed, U.S. Atty., of Cleveland, Ohio, for the United States.

Before HICKS and SIMONS, Circuit Judges, and O'BRIEN, District Judge.


It appearing upon the record in these appeals that evidence procured by wire tapping constituted a vital factor in the conviction of appellants, and that such testimony is forbidden by section 605 of the Federal Communication Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C.A. § 605 (see Frank Carmine Nardone et al. v. United States of America, 58 S.Ct. 275, 82 L.Ed. ___, decided by the Supreme Court December 20, 1937), it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgments appealed from be, and the same are, reversed and the cases are remanded to the District Court for new trials.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Diamond v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 17, 1938
94 F.2d 1012 (6th Cir. 1938)
Case details for

Diamond v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Max DIAMOND v. UNITED STATES. Louis ROTHKOPF v. UNITED STATES. Albert…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Feb 17, 1938

Citations

94 F.2d 1012 (6th Cir. 1938)

Citing Cases

United States v. Weiss

on by wire or radio and use the same or any information therein contained for his own benefit or for the…

Weiss v. United States

Because of conflict of decision in the Circuit Courts of Appeal we granted certiorari, limited to the…