From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diamond v. Mobile Hous. Bd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 27, 2020
CIVIL ACTION 20-0078-CG-MU (S.D. Ala. Mar. 27, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 20-0078-CG-MU

03-27-2020

COREY L. DIAMOND, Plaintiff, v. MOBILE HOUSING BOARD, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, prior to service of process, because Diamond has failed to state a § 1983 claim against the Mobile Housing Board, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff is extended leave to file an amended complaint by not later than April 10, 2020, see Butler v. Morgan, 562 Fed.Appx. 832, 835 (11th Cir. Apr. 3, 2014) (finding that a district court must grant a plaintiff at least one opportunity to amend his complaint before dismissal, even if the plaintiff never seeks leave to amend, if it appears that the filing of an amended complaint might cure noted deficiencies); however, Plaintiff is specifically cautioned that he must supply additional information to satisfy this Court that he has a plausible claim for relief against the Mobile Housing Authority.

DONE and ORDERED this 27th day of March, 2020.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Diamond v. Mobile Hous. Bd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 27, 2020
CIVIL ACTION 20-0078-CG-MU (S.D. Ala. Mar. 27, 2020)
Case details for

Diamond v. Mobile Hous. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:COREY L. DIAMOND, Plaintiff, v. MOBILE HOUSING BOARD, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 27, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 20-0078-CG-MU (S.D. Ala. Mar. 27, 2020)