From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diamond Resort Haw. Corp. v. Bay West Kailua Bay, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Nov 14, 2011
CIVIL 10-00117-DAE-BMK (D. Haw. Nov. 14, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL 10-00117-DAE-BMK

11-14-2011

DIAMOND RESORT HAWAII CORPORATION, a Hawaii corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BAY WEST KAILUA BAY, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on October 25, 2011, and no objections having been filed by any party,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS BE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART," docket entry no. 93, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 14, 2011.

David Alan Ezra

United States District Judge
Diamond Resort Hawaii Corporation vs. Bay West Kailua Bay, LLC, Civil No. 10-00117 DAE-BMK; ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION


Summaries of

Diamond Resort Haw. Corp. v. Bay West Kailua Bay, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Nov 14, 2011
CIVIL 10-00117-DAE-BMK (D. Haw. Nov. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Diamond Resort Haw. Corp. v. Bay West Kailua Bay, LLC

Case Details

Full title:DIAMOND RESORT HAWAII CORPORATION, a Hawaii corporation, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Date published: Nov 14, 2011

Citations

CIVIL 10-00117-DAE-BMK (D. Haw. Nov. 14, 2011)