From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diallo v. Ruan Transport Corp.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 26, 2021
18-CV-1834 (KNF) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 26, 2021)

Opinion

18-CV-1834 (KNF)

07-26-2021

OUSMANE H. DIALLO, Plaintiff, v. RUAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION and ERIC C. RAMIREZ, Defendants.


ORDER

KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

In the parties' joint pretrial order, the defendants identify several physicians from whom, it appears, the defendants will seek, without objection, to elicit opinion evidence, as contemplated by Rules 702 and 703 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. To enable the Court to perform its gatekeeping obligation, see Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786 (1993), and determine, inter alia, whether the prospective physician witnesses should be allowed to give opinion evidence at the trial of this action, on or before August 10, 2021, the defendants shall file evidence, via affidavit(s) or otherwise, and a memorandum of law establishing that the prospective witnesses' respective opinions should be received in evidence at the trial.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Diallo v. Ruan Transport Corp.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 26, 2021
18-CV-1834 (KNF) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Diallo v. Ruan Transport Corp.

Case Details

Full title:OUSMANE H. DIALLO, Plaintiff, v. RUAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION and ERIC…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 26, 2021

Citations

18-CV-1834 (KNF) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 26, 2021)