From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Di Teodoro v. Lazy Dolphin Development Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 31, 1983
432 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Summary

holding that prevailing party on appeal was entitled to recover appellate costs judgment and enjoy immediate execution without awaiting disposition of case on remand

Summary of this case from Lucas v. Barnett Bank of Lee County

Opinion

No. 81-358.

May 31, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Monroe County, Helio Gomez, J.

Thomas Thomas and Frank Thomas, Hollywood, for appellants.

Fertig Curtis and Richard S. Womble, David Wm. Boone, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.


ORDER ON REVIEW OF TAXATION OF COSTS


The appellants seek review of an order postponing the taxation of appellate costs relating to a prior appeal in this cause, Di Teodoro v. Lazy Dolphin Development Co., 418 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), until after the entire case has been disposed of at trial.

Under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(a), the prevailing party in this court is automatically entitled to taxation of certain enumerated costs unless otherwise directed by the respective courts of appeal. The rule expressly provides:

Costs shall be taxed by the lower tribunal on motion served within 30 days after issuance of the mandate.

Because plaintiff prevailed in this court, he was, after issuance of our mandate, entitled to then recover his cost judgment and enjoy an immediate writ of execution. Yost v. Congress International Development Corp., 383 So.2d 732 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). He is not required to await the ultimate disposition of the case on remand.

For the foregoing reason, the cause is reversed and remanded with directions to immediately award appellate costs.


Summaries of

Di Teodoro v. Lazy Dolphin Development Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 31, 1983
432 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

holding that prevailing party on appeal was entitled to recover appellate costs judgment and enjoy immediate execution without awaiting disposition of case on remand

Summary of this case from Lucas v. Barnett Bank of Lee County
Case details for

Di Teodoro v. Lazy Dolphin Development Co.

Case Details

Full title:GILBERT A. DI TEODORO AND PATRICIA A. DI TEODORO, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 31, 1983

Citations

432 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Stringer v. Katzell

68 in appellate costs and denied appellees' motion for rehearing and stay of execution. Because appellant was…

Dahly v. Department of Children & Family Services

Under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(a), unless otherwise directed by this court, the prevailing…