From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Di Blasi v. Caldara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 1986
123 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

October 20, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Stolarik, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants argue that the award of $42,000 in damages was excessive. On the appendix filed, however, which is limited to the summation and the charge, and does not contain any trial testimony, or for that matter, a copy of the plaintiff's bill of particulars, it is impossible to determine whether such is the case. Review by this court is limited by the appendix on appeal (see, Block v Nelson, 71 A.D.2d 509; see also, CPLR 5528 [a] [5]; 22 NYCRR 670.17 [h]). We have considered the other issues raised by the defendants and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Di Blasi v. Caldara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 1986
123 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Di Blasi v. Caldara

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA DI BLASI, Respondent, v. JOSEPH CALDARA et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 1986

Citations

123 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Skinner v. City of Glen Cove

Thus, the Supreme Court properly disregarded it (see, Koump v. Smith, 25 N.Y.2d 287, 300; see also, Matter of…

Siegel v. Siegel

The defendant contends that the court erred in directing him to pay $79,771 in unpaid taxes. Since the…