From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Hancock Natural Res. Grp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 31, 2016
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-01435-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2016)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:15-CV-01435-LJO-JLT

03-31-2016

DHILLON R. SINGH and KERN LERDO NUTS, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. HANCOCK NATURAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT AND VACATING APRIL 11, 2016 HEARING (Doc. 24)

Plaintiffs Dhillon R. Singh and Kern Lerdo Nuts, Inc. ("Plaintiffs") have moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) ("Rule 60(b)") for relief) from the Court's March 3, 2016 Order granting Defendants' unopposed motions to dismiss their complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Doc. 24. According to their Motion, Plaintiffs failed to file a timely response to Defendants' motions because on or around the beginning of February 2016, their previous attorney notified them that he had suffered a heart attack and could no longer represent them in these proceedings. Id., at 4. Plaintiffs were unable to retain a new attorney prior to the filing deadline of February 14, 2016. Id., at 5. Defendants do not oppose this Motion. Docs. 26-27.

Under Rule 60(b), the Court may relieve a party from a final judgment or order because of mistake, inadvertence, surprise, excusable neglect, or "any other reason that justifies relief." The Court finds that Plaintiffs have established such grounds for relief from the Court's March 3, 2016 Order.

CONCLUSION AND ORDERS

Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiffs' Motion for Relief from Judgment (Doc. 24) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to VACATE the Court's March 3, 2016 Judgment and Order granting Defendants' motions to dismiss and REOPEN the case so that Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint. The amended complaint is due no later than seven (7) days from the date this Order is filed.

2. The hearing on Plaintiffs' motion, currently set for April 11, 2016 at 8:30 am, is VACATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 31 , 2016

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Singh v. Hancock Natural Res. Grp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 31, 2016
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-01435-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2016)
Case details for

Singh v. Hancock Natural Res. Grp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DHILLON R. SINGH and KERN LERDO NUTS, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. HANCOCK NATURAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 31, 2016

Citations

CASE NO. 1:15-CV-01435-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2016)