From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeWolf v. Wayne Cnty.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jan 28, 2022
201 A.D.3d 1301 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

18 CA 21-01069

01-28-2022

In the Matter of Arbitration Between Andrew DEWOLF, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WAYNE COUNTY, Respondent-Respondent. (Appeal No. 2.)

ANDREW DEWOLF, PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE. HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. YOUNGS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.


ANDREW DEWOLF, PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE.

HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. YOUNGS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., NEMOYER, CURRAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed (see Matter of Rochester Genesee Regional Transp. Auth. v. Stensrud , 162 A.D.3d 1495, 1495, 79 N.Y.S.3d 773 [4th Dept. 2018], lv dismissed 35 N.Y.3d 950, 124 N.Y.S.3d 617, 147 N.E.3d 1155 [2020] ) and the order is affirmed without costs.


Summaries of

DeWolf v. Wayne Cnty.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jan 28, 2022
201 A.D.3d 1301 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

DeWolf v. Wayne Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Arbitration Between Andrew DEWOLF, Petitioner-Appellant…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 28, 2022

Citations

201 A.D.3d 1301 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
158 N.Y.S.3d 676