From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeVito v. Port Auth. of N.Y. and New Jersey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 6, 1995
214 A.D.2d 349 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 6, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.).


The records of certain of plaintiff husband's treatment some two and a half years before the accident, are not material and necessary to the loss of consortium claim or defenses thereto. Even if they were, the interests of justice do not significantly outweigh the need for confidentiality in the circumstances. We have considered defendant-appellant's other arguments and find them to be meritless.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Rubin, Ross and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

DeVito v. Port Auth. of N.Y. and New Jersey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 6, 1995
214 A.D.2d 349 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

DeVito v. Port Auth. of N.Y. and New Jersey

Case Details

Full title:DAVID DeVITO et al., Respondents, v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 6, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 349 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 136