From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Desroses v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Feb 3, 2021
317 So. 3d 169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D20-1763

02-03-2021

Jean DESROSES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Jean Desroses, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.


Jean Desroses, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Brooks v. State, 969 So. 2d 238, 243 (Fla. 2007) (holding that the "could have been imposed" test is the proper one to apply to a rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence resulting from a scoresheet error, and that "if the trial court could have imposed the same sentence using a corrected scoresheet, any error was harmless"); Masis v. State, 245 So. 3d 913 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).


Summaries of

Desroses v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Feb 3, 2021
317 So. 3d 169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Desroses v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jean Desroses, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Feb 3, 2021

Citations

317 So. 3d 169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Citing Cases

Desroses v. State

This Court per curiam affirmed. Desroses v. State, 317 So. 3d 169 (Fla. 3d DCA Feb. 3, 2021). The State was…