From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Desai v. US Bank

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Apr 30, 2007
CASE NO. 8:06CV779 (D. Neb. Apr. 30, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 8:06CV779.

April 30, 2007


ORDER


The matter before the Court is the Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension (Filing No. 60), in which the Plaintiffs seek an extension of fourteen days to file a response to the Defendants Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Fidelity National Title, and Fidelity National Title Insurance Company of New York's Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 30).

The Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss on March 15, 2007. Considering the three-day mailing allowance, the Plaintiffs' response was due on or before Monday, April 9, 2007. The Plaintiffs filed their current motion on April 25, 2007, asking for an additional fourteen days. However, at the time of filing the Motion for Extension, over fourteen days had already expired. Consequently, the Court will interpret the Plaintiffs' motion as a request for an additional fourteen days from the date the Motion for Extension was filed.

The Court finds the Plaintiffs' motion should be granted. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension (Filing No. 60) is granted; and
2. The Plaintiffs' brief in opposition to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be due on or before May 9, 2007.


Summaries of

Desai v. US Bank

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Apr 30, 2007
CASE NO. 8:06CV779 (D. Neb. Apr. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Desai v. US Bank

Case Details

Full title:PRAVIN O. DESAI, KAJAL PROPERTIES, LLC, NPHD, INC., JAYMINE ENTERPRISE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Apr 30, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 8:06CV779 (D. Neb. Apr. 30, 2007)