From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeRosa v. Valentino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 27, 2005
14 A.D.3d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5195

January 27, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered July 30, 2004, which denied defendant Donahue's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.


Although the injured plaintiff and defendant Donahue both testified that the vehicle they were traveling in was rear-ended by the Valentino vehicle, propelling them forward and causing a chain collision, defendant Ann Valentino's testimony created an issue of fact as to whether her vehicle actually came in contact with the Donahue vehicle. These differing versions of how the accident occurred, and the possible contributions by the various defendants, preclude summary disposition.


Summaries of

DeRosa v. Valentino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 27, 2005
14 A.D.3d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

DeRosa v. Valentino

Case Details

Full title:FRANK DeROSA et al., Respondents, v. ANN VALENTINO et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 27, 2005

Citations

14 A.D.3d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
788 N.Y.S.2d 369

Citing Cases

Ramirez v. Chan

"These differing versions of how the accident occurred, and the possible contributions by the various…

Nyala C. v. Miniventures Child Care Dev. Ctr., Inc.

However, the employee and another employee testified that the infant plaintiff had never asked for…