From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D.E.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 25, 2008
993 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2D07-676.

January 25, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Charles B. Curry, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn M. Giambalvo, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

D.E.R., pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


We affirm the order withholding adjudication and placing D.E.R. on probation without prejudice to his filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court to challenge the voluntariness of his plea based on alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. See Stall v. T.G., 800 So.2d 204, 213 (Fla. 2001) (recognizing that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 does not apply to juvenile proceedings); J.M.B. v. State, 750 So.2d 654, 655 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (stating that when a juvenile does not file a motion to withdraw his plea, "the proper avenue for a juvenile to challenge the voluntariness of his plea is by petition for writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court").

Affirmed.

SALCINES and VILLANTI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

D.E.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 25, 2008
993 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

D.E.R. v. State

Case Details

Full title:D.E.R., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 25, 2008

Citations

993 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

State v. S.S

As the State acknowledges, a juvenile can challenge the voluntariness of a plea by petition for writ of…

M.N. v. State

To the extent that M.N. believes his plea was involuntary because he was led to believe he could appeal the…