Dep't of Human Servs. v. J. A. (In re K. A.)

2 Citing cases

  1. Dep't of Human Servs. v. L. N. S. (In re A. S.)

    328 Or. App. 588 (Or. Ct. App. 2023)

    It will be up to the appellate court to determine the existence and significance of those effects or consequences and to decide, as a prudential matter, whether an appeal is moot." Dept. of Human Services v. J. A. , 324 Or App 445, 448-49, 525 P.3d 1245 (2023) (internal citations, quotation marks, brackets, and ellipsis omitted). As we explain below, we conclude that DHS has demonstrated that the consequences that mother identified are legally insufficient to render her appeal justiciable.

  2. State v. Barr

    331 Or. App. 242 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)   Cited 7 times

    closely related harmlessness and mootness arguments.See Dept. of Human Services v. J. A., 324 Or.App. 445, 448, 525 P.3d 1245 (2023) (a party asserting mootness must show that the court's decision will not "have a practical effect on the rights of the parties" (internal quotation marks omitted)). We therefore remand for resentencing, based on the error in sentencing on Counts 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, and 14.