From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dep't of Children & Families v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Aug 27, 2021
324 So. 3d 70 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 5D21-1596

08-27-2021

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida and Sonia Renea Clay, Respondents.

Andrew J. McGinley, Florida Department of Children and Families, Tallahassee, for Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent, State of Florida. No Appearance for Other Respondent.


Andrew J. McGinley, Florida Department of Children and Families, Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent, State of Florida.

No Appearance for Other Respondent.

TRAVER, J.

The Department of Children and Families ("DCF"), a non-party to a criminal felony case, petitions for certiorari review of a monetary judgment entered against it. Because the trial court did not have jurisdiction to enter the judgment, we grant the petition and quash the judgment.

In 2016, the trial court accepted Sonia Clay's no-contest plea to obtaining public benefits through fraud. It withheld adjudication and sentenced her to five years' probation. The trial court also ordered her to pay DCF $15,658.24 in restitution. Five years later, the trial court ordered Clay to appear at a violation of probation hearing to explain why she had not fully paid the ordered restitution. At the hearing, Clay apparently established that she had not only paid the ordered restitution, but an additional $5,978.70. The trial court unsuccessfully attempted to telephone DCF, a non-party which had not received notice of, and was not present at, the hearing. Two months later, without further hearing and on its own initiative, the trial court entered a judgment against DCF for $5,978.70.

DCF petitions for certiorari relief, alleging that when the trial court entered a judgment against it, the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law and caused it injury irremediable on direct appeal. We agree.

The trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter a judgment against DCF, a non-party to Clay's criminal case. See Alger v. Peters , 88 So. 2d 903, 906 (Fla. 1956) ("It is so fundamental to our concept of justice that a citation of supporting authorities is unnecessary to hold that the rights of an individual cannot be adjudicated in a judicial proceeding to which he has not been made a party and from which he has literally been excluded by the failure of the moving party to bring him properly into court."); Chase v. Turner , 560 So. 2d 1317, 1319 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) ("[A] court cannot award judgment against someone who is not a party to the action."). We therefore quash the judgment on appeal.

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED.

LAMBERT, C.J., and EISNAUGLE, J., concur.


Summaries of

Dep't of Children & Families v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Aug 27, 2021
324 So. 3d 70 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Dep't of Children & Families v. State

Case Details

Full title:DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA AND…

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 27, 2021

Citations

324 So. 3d 70 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)