From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DePalo v. L.M.T. Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 2002
295 A.D.2d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-08726

Submitted May 15, 2002.

June 18, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated January 9, 2001, which denied its motion to vacate a judgment of the same court, entered June 27, 1996, in favor of the plaintiff and against it upon its failure to appear or answer.

Louis Klieger, New York, N.Y. (Sandra D. Janin of counsel), for appellant.

Jacoby Meyers, Newburgh, N.Y. (Edward M. Steves of counsel), for respondents.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, LEO F. McGINITY, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the defendant's answer is deemed served and filed.

Pursuant to CPLR 317, relief from a default may be obtained upon a showing that a defendant did not receive actual notice of the summons in time to defend and has a meritorious defense (see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 N.Y.2d 138). Here, the defendant demonstrated its entitlement to relief pursuant to CPLR 317 (see Kavourias v. Big Six Pharmacy, 262 A.D.2d 456), and the plaintiffs failed to oppose the motion. Accordingly, the defendant's motion should have been granted.

PRUDENTI, P.J., O'BRIEN, McGINITY and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

DePalo v. L.M.T. Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 2002
295 A.D.2d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

DePalo v. L.M.T. Realty Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT DePALO, ET AL., respondents, v. L.M.T. REALTY CO., appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 18, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
744 N.Y.S.2d 676