From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeOca v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 13, 1976
326 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 75-203.

February 13, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Peter M. deManio, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Bruce Zeidel, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert B. Breisblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


A review of the proceedings below reveals that the learned trial judge failed to follow the provisions of Rule 3.710, FRCrP, which provides, in part, that no sentence shall be imposed upon a defendant found guilty of a first felony offense until a pre-sentence investigation and recommendation has been received and considered by the sentencing judge. Davenport v. State, Fla.App.1st, 1975, 317 So.2d 851; Buckles v. State, Fla.App.1st, 1975, 310 So.2d 748. Since the error was a defect in sentencing the judgment is affirmed, the sentence vacated and the cause is remanded with directions to conduct a pre-sentence investigation pursuant to Rule 3.710 followed by further proceedings consistent herewith.

WALDEN, C.J., and MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

DeOca v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 13, 1976
326 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

DeOca v. State

Case Details

Full title:HENRY MONTS DeOCA, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 13, 1976

Citations

326 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Parker v. State

GUNTHER, Judge. The defendant was found guilty of his first felony offense and was sentenced by the trial…

Mitchell v. State

The trial court's failure to receive or consider a pre-sentence investigation report prior to sentencing…