From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Denny v. Wright O'Rourke

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 10, 1903
74 P. 104 (Okla. 1903)

Opinion

Filed September 10, 1903.

1. PETITION IN ERROR — Dismissed, When. Where a petition in error is filed in the supreme court, and there is not filed therewith a transcript of the proceedings containing the final judgment or order sought to be reversed, vacated or modified, or the original papers, process, files, and bill of exceptions or a case made, no question is presented for review.

2. EVIDENCE — When part of Record. Evidence is not a part of the record unless made so by case-made or bill of exceptions.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from the District Court of Canadian County; before C. F. Irwin, Trial Judge.

Goodwin Reid, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendants in error.


Opinion of the court by


This purports to be an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Canadian county. Attached to the petition in error is what purports to be simply a stenographer's transcript of the evidence taken at the trial of the case. There is no copy of any of the pleadings or any judgment or final order of the trial court in the case, nor any motion for new trial shown. The record upon the conclusion of the testimony discloses that there was a motion made by defendants' counsel to dismiss as to the defendants Wright O'Rourke. This motion was by the court sustained, to which ruling the plaintiff excepted and thus the record concludes.

Where a petition in error is filed in this court and there is not filed therewith a transcript of the proceedings containing the final judgment or order sought to be reversed, vacated or modified or the original papers, process, files, and bill of exceptions or case-made, no question is presented to this court for review. ( Gardenhire v. Burdick, 7 Okla. 212; Sproat v. Durland, 7 Okla. 230; Commissioners v. Moon, 8 Okla. 205.)

Evidence is not a part of the record unless made so by case-made or bill of exceptions. ( McMechan v. Christy, 3 Okla. 301; U.S. v. C. O. G. R. R. Co., 3 Okla. 404.)

The appeal is dismissed, with costs to plaintiff in error.

Irwin, J., who presided in the court below, not sitting; Gillette, J., absent; all the other Justices concurring.


Summaries of

Denny v. Wright O'Rourke

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 10, 1903
74 P. 104 (Okla. 1903)
Case details for

Denny v. Wright O'Rourke

Case Details

Full title:ELWOOD DENNY v. WRIGHT O'ROURKE, a partnership, AND F. H. WRIGHT AND J. J…

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 10, 1903

Citations

74 P. 104 (Okla. 1903)
74 P. 104

Citing Cases

Schuck et al. v. Moore

Opinion by DEVEREUX, C. (after stating the facts as above). The petition in error and appeal must be…

Mobley v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co.

There is no journal entry of judgment in the record of the court's ruling on the demurrer to the evidence,…