From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dennis v. Kernan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 28, 2022
2:16-cv-0542 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2022)

Opinion

2:16-cv-0542 JAM AC P

04-28-2022

MATTHEW DENNIS, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed a motion for judicial notice and objections to the April 15, 2022 order, which include a request for leave to file an untimely motion for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 204, 205.

The objections will be addressed by the assigned district judge. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a).

Plaintiff requests that the court take judicial notice of the motions in limine he mailed to the court on March 27, 2022, and consider them when ruling on defendants' motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 204. Plaintiff's motions in limine are not evidence going toward the merits of the case and are therefore not appropriate for consideration in ruling on defendants' summaryjudgment motion. The request for judicial notice will therefore be denied.

Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an untimely motion for summary judgment establishes 1 excusable neglect and will be granted. Plaintiff is advised that his motion for summary judgment must comply with the following guidelines. The motion may not exceed thirty-five pages, not including the separate statement of facts and any exhibits. The motion may address only why plaintiff believes that he is entitled to summary judgment on his claims against defendants Mays and Allison. The motion should not include other requests for relief, attempt to revive previously dismissed claims or defendants, or address other issues. The motion must be accompanied by a separate statement of facts, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) and Local Rule 260(a). Each fact must be separately numbered and supported by a citation to “the particular portions of any pleading, affidavit, deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or other document relied upon to establish that fact.” L.R. 260(a); Fed. R. Civ. P 56(c). The statement of facts should not include any arguments or legal citations. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with these guidelines will result in the motion for summary judgment being stricken from the record.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's request for judicial notice (ECF No. 204) is DENIED.

2. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an untimely motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 205) is GRANTED.

3. Within forty-five days of the service of this order, plaintiff may file a motion for summary judgment that complies with the guidelines set forth above. Any motion for summary judgment that does not comply with the specified guidelines will be stricken from the record. 2


Summaries of

Dennis v. Kernan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 28, 2022
2:16-cv-0542 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Dennis v. Kernan

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW DENNIS, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 28, 2022

Citations

2:16-cv-0542 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2022)