From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dempsey v. Greenville Heritage Fed. Credit Union

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Apr 8, 2015
Civil Action No. 6:15-664-TMC (D.S.C. Apr. 8, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 6:15-664-TMC

04-08-2015

Arthur Lewis Dempsey, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Greenville Heritage Federal Credit Union; Rick Stephens, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, Arthur Lewis Dempsey, Jr., filed this action alleging Defendants violated federal and South Carolina laws. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02, D.S.C., this matter was referred to a magistrate judge for pretrial handling. Before the court is the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation ("Report"), recommending that Plaintiff's action be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has now run.

The Report has no presumptive weight and the responsibility to make a final determination in this matter remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). In the absence of objections, this court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). Rather, "in the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note).

After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case, the court adopts the magistrate judge's Report (ECF No. 18) and incorporates it herein. Accordingly, Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance and service of process.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Timothy M. Cain

United States District Judge
April 8, 2015
Anderson, South Carolina

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this order pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Dempsey v. Greenville Heritage Fed. Credit Union

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Apr 8, 2015
Civil Action No. 6:15-664-TMC (D.S.C. Apr. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Dempsey v. Greenville Heritage Fed. Credit Union

Case Details

Full title:Arthur Lewis Dempsey, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Greenville Heritage Federal…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 8, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 6:15-664-TMC (D.S.C. Apr. 8, 2015)

Citing Cases

Scott v. Chrome Capital, LLC

Because Plaintiff fails to allege Defendant is a debt collector, his cause of action under the FDCPA must…

Cooper v. Chrysler Capital

Specifically, Plaintiff states that Chrysler Capital was the entity that originally financed her purchase of…