Opinion
CASE NO. C19-6253-BHS-TLF
04-14-2020
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Theresa L. Fricke, United States Magistrate Judge, Dkt. 2, and Plaintiff's objections to the R&R, Dkt. 3.
On December 28, 2019, Plaintiff John Robert Demos ("Demos") filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and a proposed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Dkts. 1, 1-1. On February 28, 2020, Judge Fricke issued the R&R recommending that the Court deny Demos's application and dismiss the proposed complaint in accordance with this Court's standing bar orders. Dkt. 2. On March 7, 2020, Demos filed objections. Dkt. 3.
The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).
Nothing in Demos's objections demonstrates that Judge Fricke's recommendation is in error. Pursuant to this Court's standing bar order, Demos is limited to three in forma pauperis applications and proposed actions per calendar year. See In re John Robert Demos, 91-mc-269-CRD (W.D. Wash. Jan. 16, 1992). As Judge Fricke correctly noted, Demos had already filed three in forma pauperis applications and proposed actions in 2019. Dkt. 2 at 2. Additionally, Demos failed to satisfy the "imminent danger" requirement for three-strikes litigants under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Therefore, the Court having considered the R&R, Demos's objections, and the remaining record, does hereby find and order as follows:
(1) The R&R is ADOPTED;
(2) Demos's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED;
(3) Demos's proposed complaint is DISMISSED; and
(4) The Clerk shall enter a JUDGMENT and close the case.
Dated this 14th day of April, 2020.
/s/_________
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
United States District Judge