From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Demay v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Aug 2, 2005
168 S.W.3d 121 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. ED 85677.

August 2, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; John A. Ross, Judge.

Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.


ORDER


Movant, Phillip Demay, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant alleges his guilty plea was involuntary because his counsel failed to locate, interview, and endorse three witnesses.

The trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Demay v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Aug 2, 2005
168 S.W.3d 121 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Demay v. State

Case Details

Full title:Phillip DEMAY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Aug 2, 2005

Citations

168 S.W.3d 121 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)