From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Demartini v. Chatham Green, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 31, 1991
169 A.D.2d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

January 31, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.).


We disagree with defendants' contention that plaintiff failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits so as to warrant the granting of the preliminary injunction. While not conclusive, there was evidence supporting plaintiff's assertion that she was offered cooperative apartment 14c for purchase prior to another applicant, and that defendants improperly refused to accept plaintiff's application.

In this declaratory judgment action, a justiciable controversy between the parties is evident and the defendants' cross motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action was properly denied. (See, Winkler v Spinnato, 134 A.D.2d 66, appeal withdrawn 72 N.Y.2d 910.)

We have considered the remaining arguments and find them to be meritless.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Wallach, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Demartini v. Chatham Green, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 31, 1991
169 A.D.2d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Demartini v. Chatham Green, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TONI DEMARTINI, Respondent, v. CHATHAM GREEN, INC., et al., Appellants, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 31, 1991

Citations

169 A.D.2d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

Worbes Corp. v. Sebrow

While the proponent of a preliminary injunction need not tender conclusive proof beyond any factual dispute…

Vignola v. JDM Wash. St.

( CPLR 6301, et seq. ; see alsoBarbes Rest. Inc. v ASRR Suzer 218, LLC, 140 AD3d 430 [1st Dept 2016].…