From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Demarinis v. Donovan

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 2, 1986
790 F.2d 1419 (9th Cir. 1986)

Opinion

No. 83-7489.

June 2, 1986.

John William Cumming, Eureka, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.

Dennis A. Paquette, Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee.

Petition for review from the Secretary of Labor.

Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The facts are stated in Demarinis v. Donovan, 728 F.2d 1266 (9th Cir. 1984).

On petition for rehearing, the government points out that under California law the Director of the Employment Development Department has the authority in certain cases to terminate benefits to ineligible recipients after they had been initially found eligible under an erroneous construction of a statute.

We have reexamined the record in this case and have concluded that this is a proper case for reconsideration by the Director. Demarinis voluntarily quit his job under circumstances which, while perhaps qualifying him for unemployment compensation, did not constitute a lay off caused by the Redwood Park expansion. Accordingly, he was not eligible for prospective payments after his case was reviewed. The petition for rehearing is granted, and the judgment for the petitioner ordered in our opinion of March 21, 1984, is vacated.

Neither party to recover costs.

Circuit Judge SCHROEDER dissents and would deny the petition for rehearing.


Summaries of

Demarinis v. Donovan

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 2, 1986
790 F.2d 1419 (9th Cir. 1986)
Case details for

Demarinis v. Donovan

Case Details

Full title:JOHN E. DEMARINIS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. RAYMOND J. DONOVAN, SECRETARY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 2, 1986

Citations

790 F.2d 1419 (9th Cir. 1986)

Citing Cases

Holt v. Donovan

The panel in Demarinis has now granted a petition for rehearing and vacated its judgment. See Demarinis v.…