From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deloach v. Fla. Parole Prob. Comm

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 10, 1982
423 So. 2d 480 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. AL-367.

December 10, 1982.

Appeal from the Parole and Probation Commission.

Theadell Deloach, in pro. per.

Malcolm S. Greenfield, Gen. Counsel, Fla. Parole and Probation Com'n, Tallahassee, for appellee.


Deloach, a prisoner at Lawtey Correctional Institution, appeals from a commission decision that established his presumptive parole release date. We affirm.

A review of the record reveals Deloach's initial point to be meritless as the Commission Action Form clearly reflects that the commission aggravated nineteen months for each of the two concurrent convictions.

As to Deloach's final point, the commission properly aggravated his score using concurrent sentences pursuant to Rule 23-19.01(5), Florida Administrative Code. In Glisson v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 420 So.2d 336 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) [7 FLW 2082], this Court held that "the use of concurrent sentences as aggravating factors . . . does not encroach on the function of the judiciary and does not violate the separation of powers clause, Article II, Section 3, Florida Constitution."

AFFIRMED.

SHAW and JOANOS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Deloach v. Fla. Parole Prob. Comm

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 10, 1982
423 So. 2d 480 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Deloach v. Fla. Parole Prob. Comm

Case Details

Full title:THEADELL DELOACH, APPELLANT, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 10, 1982

Citations

423 So. 2d 480 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Lowe v. Fla. Parole Probation Comm

See Rule 23-21.10(4)(a)(1)(h), Florida Administrative Code; DeLoach v. Florida Parole Probation Commission,…