From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delbert Coffee v. Tex. Dep't of Criminal Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jun 24, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv112 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 24, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv112

06-24-2017

DELBERT COFFEE v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT

This lawsuit was severed out of a larger civil action and was referred by the Court to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges. The Magistrate Judge directed the Plaintiff to file an amended complaint and to pay the statutory filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but the Plaintiff did not comply with these orders.

After review of the record, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that the lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court. A copy of this Report was sent to the Plaintiff at his last known address, return receipt requested, but no objections have been received; accordingly, he is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3243 (1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge's Report are filed, the standard of review is "clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law.") It is accordingly

ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge (docket no. 4) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court. Finally, it is

ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this action are hereby DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24 day of June, 2017.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Delbert Coffee v. Tex. Dep't of Criminal Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jun 24, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv112 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 24, 2017)
Case details for

Delbert Coffee v. Tex. Dep't of Criminal Justice

Case Details

Full title:DELBERT COFFEE v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Jun 24, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv112 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 24, 2017)