From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delarosa v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Nov 18, 2021
Civil Action 9:21-CV-62 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 18, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 9:21-CV-62

11-18-2021

DANIEL DELAROSA v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CHRISTINE L STETSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner Daniel Delarosa, an inmate confined at the Eastham Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, brings this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Title 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a) allows a district court to “entertain an application for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). A state prisoner is required to file his federal petition for writ of habeas corpus in either the district where the prisoner is incarcerated or the district where the prisoner was convicted and sentenced. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Although both district courts have jurisdiction to entertain the application, “[t]he district court for the district wherein such an application is filed in the exercise of its discretion and in furtherance of justice may transfer the application to the other district court for hearing and determination.” Id.

Petitioner filed this Petition in the Lufkin Division of the Eastern District of Texas. This court has jurisdiction because Petitioner is incarcerated in this district. However, Petitioner was convicted and sentenced in Navarro County, which is located in the Northern District of Texas. The court has considered the circumstances and has determined that the interests of justice would be served by transferring this Petition to the district where Petitioner was convicted and sentenced. Therefore, the Petition should be transferred to the Dallas Division of the Northern District of Texas for hearing and determination. It is accordingly

ORDERED that this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is TRANSFERRED to the Dallas Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.


Summaries of

Delarosa v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Nov 18, 2021
Civil Action 9:21-CV-62 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Delarosa v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL DELAROSA v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division

Date published: Nov 18, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 9:21-CV-62 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 18, 2021)