Delarm v. McDonald

Full title: MICHAEL R. DELARM, Petitioner, v. M. D. MCDONALD, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 20, 2015

2:11-cv-0750 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2015)

Opinion

MICHAEL R. DELARM, Petitioner, v. M. D. MCDONALD, Respondent. No. 2:11-cv-0750 CKD P United States District Court, Eastern District of California January 20, 2015

          ORDER ¹

1 The parties have consented to have all matters in this action heard by a United States Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

         On January 14, 2015, the Ninth Circuit remanded this action to this court for the granting or denial of a certificate of appealability, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), with respect to this court's October 17, 2014 denial of petitioner's October 14, 2014 motion for reconsideration. Because petitioner fails to point to any valid reason why this court should reconsider dismissal of this action as time-barred (see ECF Nos. 58 & 61) and jurists of reason would not find it debatable whether he has, see Slack v. McDaniel 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) a certificate of appealability is denied.