From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delant-Cory v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 19, 2012
1:12-cv-94-CL (D. Or. Mar. 19, 2012)

Opinion

1:12-cv-94-CL

03-19-2012

DELANT-CORY; FAMILY OF PALMERTON, PAG Plaintiff, v. DANIEL L. HARRIS and RONALD GRENSK, Defendants.


ORDER

PANNER , District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation and the matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections and I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I conclude the R & R is correct.

I adopt the Report and Recommendation (#31). This matter is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Delant-Cory v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 19, 2012
1:12-cv-94-CL (D. Or. Mar. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Delant-Cory v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:DELANT-CORY; FAMILY OF PALMERTON, PAG Plaintiff, v. DANIEL L. HARRIS and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Mar 19, 2012

Citations

1:12-cv-94-CL (D. Or. Mar. 19, 2012)