Opinion
2001-09457
Argued October 7, 2002.
October 28, 2002.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Cornwall, dated November 20, 2000, which, after a hearing, granted the application of Paul Krafft, d/b/a Mountainville Manor, inter alia, for permission to expand his pre-existing, nonconforming commercial use, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Lange, J.), dated August 16, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
Carter, Ledyard Milburn, New York, N.Y. (Jean M. McCarroll and Mark D. Sullivan of counsel), for appellants.
Drake, Sommers, Loeb, Tarshis Catania, PLLC, Newburgh, N.Y. (Stephen J. Gaba of counsel), for respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Cornwall.
Bloom Bloom, P.C., New Windsor, N.Y. (Daniel J. Bloom of counsel), for respondent Paul Krafft, d/b/a Mountainville Manor.
Before: NANCY E. SMITH, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, the determination is annulled, and the matter is remitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Cornwall for further proceedings.
On November 20, 2000, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Cornwall (hereinafter the Zoning Board) granted Paul Krafft, the owner of the Mountainville Manor, a banquet facility, permission to expand his pre-existing nonconforming use in an R-1 residential district. This allowed the facility to be expanded from 1,810 square feet to 3,477 square feet for additional seating and handicapped accessible bathrooms, and permitted additional parking spaces with handicapped parking spaces, additional lighting, ramps for handicapped individuals, and improvements to the septic system.
The Zoning Board failed to make a finding, as required by Cornwall Town Code § 158-29(C)(1), that granting the application would "lessen any impacts associated with the nonconforming use." Accordingly, the petition to annul the Zoning Board's determination should have been granted (cf. Matter of P.M.S. Assets v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Vil. of Pleasantville, 98 N.Y.2d 683, 685).
SMITH, J.P., McGINITY, LUCIANO and CRANE, JJ., concur.