From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delaney v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Feb 13, 2014
844 N.W.2d 362 (N.D. 2014)

Opinion

No. 20130260.

2014-02-13

Robert Earnest DELANEY, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee.


[¶ 1] Robert Delaney appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Delaney argues the court erred in finding he was not denied effective assistance of counsel and in not ensuring he voluntarily and knowingly waived his constitutional right to testify. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7), holding that the court's conclusion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that “the court does not have a duty to verify that the defendant who is not testifying has waived his or her right voluntarily” under State v. Mulske, 2007 ND 43, ¶ 11, 729 N.W.2d 129.

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, LISA FAIR McEVERS, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Delaney v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Feb 13, 2014
844 N.W.2d 362 (N.D. 2014)
Case details for

Delaney v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert Earnest DELANEY, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Feb 13, 2014

Citations

844 N.W.2d 362 (N.D. 2014)
2014 N.D. 27