From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delacy v. University Radiology Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1998
254 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 26, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A cause of action to recover damages for medical malpractice must be founded upon the existence of a doctor-patient relationship ( see, Heller v. Peekskill Community Hosp., 198 A.D.2d 265; Lee v. City of New York, 162 A.D.2d 34). The Supreme Court correctly determined that the defendants submitted proof in admissible form which established that there was no doctor-patient relationship between the plaintiff and any of the defendants.

The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit.

Miller, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Delacy v. University Radiology Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1998
254 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Delacy v. University Radiology Associates

Case Details

Full title:MAUREEN DELACY, Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P. C., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 26, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 151

Citing Cases

Tedesco v. David

A cause of action to recover damages for medical malpractice must be founded upon the existence of a…

Hanrahan v. Good Samaritan Hosp. Med. Ctr.

A physician-patient relationship is created when the professional services of a physician are rendered to and…