Del v. Board of Parole Hearings

Full title: RIGOBERTO VLADIMIR DEL CID, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Mar 20, 2011

EDCV 10-0250 VBF (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2011)

Opinion

RIGOBERTO VLADIMIR DEL CID, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, Respondent. No. EDCV 10-0250 VBF (JCG) United States District Court, C.D. California. March 20, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

          VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record. Petitioner filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation.

         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

         (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted;

         (2) judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and

         (3) the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment on the parties.

         Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.