From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dejesus v. Evans

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 8, 2013
111 A.D.3d 1340 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-11-8

In the Matter of Pablo DeJESUS, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Andrea W. EVANS, Chairwoman, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent–Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered May 23, 2012 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment denied the petition. Wyoming County–Attica Legal Aid Bureau, Warsaw (Leah R. Nowotarski of Counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant. *826Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Jonathan D. Hitsous of Counsel), for Respondent–Respondent.


Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered May 23, 2012 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.
Wyoming County–Attica Legal Aid Bureau, Warsaw (Leah R. Nowotarski of Counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant. *826Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Jonathan D. Hitsous of Counsel), for Respondent–Respondent.
MEMORANDUM:

Inasmuch as petitioner has been released to parole supervision, his appeal from the judgment denying his CPLR article 78 petition seeking release to parole has been rendered moot ( see People ex rel. Baron v. New York State Dept. of Corrections, 94 A.D.3d 1410, 1410, 942 N.Y.S.2d 392,lv. denied19 N.Y.3d 807, 2012 WL 2401232;People ex rel. Graham v. Fischer, 70 A.D.3d 1381, 1381–1382, 893 N.Y.S.2d 793;People ex rel. Mitchell v. Unger, 63 A.D.3d 1591, 1591, 879 N.Y.S.2d 761), and the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply herein ( see Baron, 94 A.D.3d at 1410, 942 N.Y.S.2d 392;Graham, 70 A.D.3d at 1381–1382, 893 N.Y.S.2d 793;see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714–715, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876).

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, and WHALEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dejesus v. Evans

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 8, 2013
111 A.D.3d 1340 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Dejesus v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Pablo DeJESUS, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Andrea W. EVANS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 8, 2013

Citations

111 A.D.3d 1340 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7358
974 N.Y.S.2d 825

Citing Cases

Singleton v. Annucci

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (ROBERT M. GOLDFARB OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. It…

Lopez-Contreras v. Annucci

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his CPLR article 78 petition seeking to annul the…