From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deich v. Lee

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 12, 1990
565 So. 2d 869 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-2743.

August 14, 1990. Rehearing Denied September 12, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Henry G. Ferro, J.

Sheldon Zipkin, Miami, for appellants.

Jerome L. Hall, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.


We reverse the summary final judgment in favor of appellees, Bernard and Esther Lee, with directions that summary final judgment be entered in favor of the appellants, Irving and Elsie Deich. The Deiches, formerly business partners with the Lees, sold all of their corporate assets to the Lees. The Lees assumed all obligations of the former enterprise and issued a hold harmless agreement in favor of the Deiches. There was no ambiguity in the hold harmless agreement so as to defeat the subsequent promissory note and schedule of payments given by Bernard Lee in favor of Irving Deich when an Internal Revenue Service claim was personally paid and satisfied by Deich. National Health Laboratories, Inc. v. Bailmar, Inc., 444 So.2d 1078 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), review denied, 453 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1984). Further, Lee's partial past payment to Deich is entitled to great weight in construction of the various instruments employed by the parties. Lalow v. Codomo, 101 So.2d 390 (Fla. 1958); Spindler v. Kushner, 284 So.2d 481 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

Accordingly, the decision of the trial court is reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Deich v. Lee

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 12, 1990
565 So. 2d 869 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Deich v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:IRVING DEICH, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BERNARD LEE, ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 12, 1990

Citations

565 So. 2d 869 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)