Opinion
Nos. 05-10-01531-CR, 05-10-01532-CR, 05-10-01533-CR
Opinion Filed July 26, 2011. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F02-73711-W, F02-73794-W, F08-72480-W.
Before Justices BRIDGES, LANG-MIERS, and MURPHY.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Josue Solar Dehoyos waived a jury and pleaded guilty to three aggravated sexual assault of a child younger than fourteen offenses. The trial court assessed punishment at twenty-five years' imprisonment in each case. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (court of appeals's duty is to determine whether there are any arguable issues, and, if so, to remand the case to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to address those issues). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgments.