Opinion
Argued May 31, 1929 —
Decided February 3, 1930.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 5 N.J. Mis. R. 1040.
For the respondents, Keating Keating.
For the appellant, Michael J. Tansey.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, KALISCH, CAMPBELL, CASE, BODINE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.