Opinion
Argued December 4, 1889
Decided December 20, 1889
Nathaniel C. Moak for appellant.
Albert Mathews for respondent.
BROWN, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Deering v. Starr
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 20, 1889
23 N.E. 125 (N.Y. 1889)
Summaries of
Deering v. Starr
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 20, 1889
23 N.E. 125 (N.Y. 1889)
Case details for
Deering v. Starr
Case Details
Full title:JAMES A. DEERING, Appellant, v . SARAH M. STARR, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 20, 1889
Citations
23 N.E. 125 (N.Y. 1889)
23 N.E. 125
27 N.Y. St. Rptr. 960
Citing Cases
Booth v. Litchfield
The plaintiff, in order to have a justifiable recovery, was bound to show that the undertaking of the clerk…