From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deel's Delivery Transfer, Inc. v. Home Depot USA, Inc.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Spartanburg Division
May 6, 2008
C/A No.: 7:08-cv-0856-GRA-WMC (D.S.C. May. 6, 2008)

Opinion

C/A No.: 7:08-cv-0856-GRA-WMC.

May 6, 2008


ORDER (Written Opinion)


This matter comes before the Court for a review of the magistrate's Report and Recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2)(e), D.S.C., filed April 10, 2008. Plaintiff originally filed this pro se suit on March 11, 2008, on behalf of himself and his company. The magistrate recommends dismissing Plaintiff Deel's Delivery Transfer, Inc. from the suit.

Plaintiff brings this claim pro se. This Court is required to construe pro se pleadings liberally. Such pleadings are held to a less stringent standard than those drafted by attorneys. See Gordon v. Leeke, 574 F.2d 1147, 1151 (4th Cir. 1978). This Court is charged with liberally construing a pleading filed by a pro se litigant to allow for the development of a potentially meritorious claim. See Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 365 (1982).

The magistrate makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and responsibility for making a final determination remains with this Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). This Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made, and this Court may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This Court may also "receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate with instructions." Id. In the absence of specific objections to the Report and Recommendation, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198 (4th. Cir. 1983). Plaintiff did not file any objections.

After a thorough review of the magistrate's Report and Recommendation, the pleadings, and the relevant case law, this Court finds that the magistrate applied sound legal principles to the facts of this case. Therefore, this Court adopts the magistrate's Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

IT IS THEREFORE SO ORDERED THAT Plaintiff Deel's Delivery Transfer, Inc. be dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

Pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has the right to appeal this Order within thirty (30) days from the date of its entry. Failure to meet this deadline, as modified by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, will waive the right to appeal.


Summaries of

Deel's Delivery Transfer, Inc. v. Home Depot USA, Inc.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Spartanburg Division
May 6, 2008
C/A No.: 7:08-cv-0856-GRA-WMC (D.S.C. May. 6, 2008)
Case details for

Deel's Delivery Transfer, Inc. v. Home Depot USA, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Deel's Delivery Transfer, Inc., and Gerald O. Deel, Owner, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Spartanburg Division

Date published: May 6, 2008

Citations

C/A No.: 7:08-cv-0856-GRA-WMC (D.S.C. May. 6, 2008)