From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deddens v. Warren Cnty. Montgomery Cnty. Cmty. Coll. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 10, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-0222 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-0222

04-10-2013

RUTH DEDDENS, et. al., Plaintiff, v. WARREN COUNTY MONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, et. al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY

The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated.

Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.

The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

WALTER H. RICE, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Copies to: All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Deddens v. Warren Cnty. Montgomery Cnty. Cmty. Coll. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 10, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-0222 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Deddens v. Warren Cnty. Montgomery Cnty. Cmty. Coll. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:RUTH DEDDENS, et. al., Plaintiff, v. WARREN COUNTY MONTGOMERY COUNTY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 10, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-0222 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2013)