From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Decicco v. Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1994
202 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 1, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Beatrice Burstein, J.).


In this action for dental malpractice, plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of liability through her expert witness. The witness said nothing of the applicable standard of care for treatment, did not know how the procedure was performed, did not set forth the manner in which defendant deviated from any standard, and did not explain how the injury was caused (see, Gibson v. D'Amico, 97 A.D.2d 905, lv denied 61 N.Y.2d 603). Nor was the alleged negligence obvious and within the competence of lay persons (see, supra, at 906). The burden of proving causation remained with plaintiff, and it is of no moment that defendant did not offer an explanation as to other possible causes of plaintiff's injury (see, Mortensen v. Memorial Hosp., 105 A.D.2d 151, 158).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Carro, Wallach and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Decicco v. Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1994
202 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Decicco v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:LOUISE DECICCO, Appellant, v. I. LLOYD ROBERTS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
607 N.Y.S.2d 946

Citing Cases

Stanski v. Ezersky

He also claimed to have suffered penile burns in the course of the surgery. In order to succeed in the…

Russac v. Crest Hollow Country Club

Moreover, Andrew admitted, inter alia, that he kept a supply of toothpicks at home and used them to clean his…