From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Decana Inc. v. Contogouris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 2, 2006
27 A.D.3d 207 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

7995N.

March 2, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.), entered June 20, 2005, which granted plaintiffs' motion to disqualify Richard B. Feldman, Esq. from representing defendants Contogouris and Schanson Capital Management LLC in this action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Rosenberg Feldman Smith LLP, New York (Michael H. Smith of counsel), for appellants.

Watson, Farley Williams (New York) LLP, New York (John G. Kissane of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Saxe, Friedman and Williams, JJ., concur.


The motion court properly exercised its discretion in granting plaintiffs' disqualification motion ( see Hirschfeld v. Stahl, 194 AD2d 388). Having presided over three matters involving these parties, the court properly determined that the issues raised in the proceedings were substantially related and that the interests of the current client and former client are materially adverse ( see Jamaica Pub. Serv. Co. v. AIU Ins. Co., 92 NY2d 631, 636). That the attorney in question may not have obtained confidential information from plaintiffs during his earlier representation of them did not render his disqualification inappropriate, since plaintiffs were entitled to be free from the apprehension, naturally arising under the circumstances at bar, that the prior representation would inure to their current adversaries' advantage ( see Greene v. Greene, 47 NY2d 447, 453; Cardinale v. Golinello, 43 NY2d 288, 295-296).

We have considered defendants' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Decana Inc. v. Contogouris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 2, 2006
27 A.D.3d 207 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Decana Inc. v. Contogouris

Case Details

Full title:DECANA INC. et al., Respondents, v. SPYRO C. CONTOGOURIS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 2, 2006

Citations

27 A.D.3d 207 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1520
810 N.Y.S.2d 453

Citing Cases

Matter of Harris

(DR 5-108 [a] [1].) The foundation for this disciplinary rule is an attorney's continuing duty to former…

Lema v. Ny-1095 Ave. of the Americas, LLC

In the absence of such writing, the Court need not comment further on whether informed consent, confirmed in…