From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Debias v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 12, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3545 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 12, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3545

06-12-2012

DON ALLEN DEBIAS, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED that the Court APPROVES and ADOPTS Chief Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells's Report and Recommendation in part and rejects it in part. Plaintiff's request for review is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and the Court REMANDS this case to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion. In particular, on remand the ALJ shall pose a complete and accurate hypothetical to the VE providing specific detail about Plaintiff's moderate social function impairment. In order to fully develop the record, the ALJ shall also obtain legible treatment notes from Dr. Lychak and determine based upon those notes the appropriate weight to give to Dr. Lychak's December 9, 2009, opinion. In doing so, the ALJ should provide a full explanation in accordance with 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.927(c)(1)-(6). In addition, if after reviewing the legible notes the ALJ finds Dr. Lychak's December 9, 2009, opinion is consistent with the other medical evidence of record, the ALJ should consider obtaining a new opinion from the state agency's physician, or explain why such an opinion is not necessary.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.


Summaries of

Debias v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 12, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3545 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Debias v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DON ALLEN DEBIAS, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 12, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3545 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 12, 2012)